Otama Wetland Relative Elevation Model

code
maps
water quality
Author

Isaac Bain

Published

September 2, 2024

1 Introduction

In a recent post, I explored the application of a Relative Elevation Model (REM) for the Waimakariri River. REMs are typically used for analysing braided river systems, but this also led me to consider their potential utility in understanding wetlands, particularly modified wetland complexes.

New Zealand has lost about 90% of its original wetland extent,1 with 87% of recent losses attributed to conversion to exotic grassland.2 Last year, Manaaki Whenua researchers estimated that 3% of remaining wetlands are potentially affected by drainage, though their case study in one catchment suggests this may be an underestimate, with the true figure potentially being three times higher.3

Theoretically, Relative Elevation Models should make drainage and other wetland modifications more discernible than a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) alone. In this post, I test this theory at Otama Beach on the Coromandel Peninsula.

In the lower part of the Otama Beach catchment lies a important remnant wetland (26 hectares)4, formed behind a large dune and fed freshwater inputs from the surrounding hills. On either side of the wetland is developed farmland, grazed with exotic grassland. The catchment also includes native forest and pine plantations.

2 Otama Catchment

The Otama Catchment is a small watershed, encompassing the main Otama River and smaller tributaries, including the Ototoro Stream, Pekapekarau Stream, Waikarikia Stream, and Waimata Stream. For those interested in the meanings of these place names, based on my interpretation from the Te Aka Māori Dictionary:

  • O-Tama: Means “my son.”
  • O-Torotoro: Could refer to “visiting a number of times” or “a small white clinging rātā.”

  • Pekapeka-Rau: Refers to the endemic bat, with “rau” meaning “to catch with a net.”

  • Wai-Karikia: Possibly derived from “karakia,” meaning “to pray.”

  • Wai-Matā: Means “flint, quartz, obsidian,” or “lava.”

The Otama Reserves Group describes the wetland as follows:

The Otama Reserves Group currently undertakes pest and weed control in the wetland and is two years into a riparian planting program on five hectares that has recently been fenced off from adjoining farmland.

The quality of the water and land practices directly relate to the health of the wetland; in particular farming practices, siltation from forestry, and draining of the wetland during inundation.

This wetland has been classified as degraded and it is our aim to restore it and bring it back to a healthy functioning wetland, and then engage the community with a bird hide and walkways throughout the wetland.

“We identified very early on that to achieve our goals and aspirations, we would require a comprehensive restoration plan for the reserve – one recognised by local government agencies, iwi, landowners and the community. The restoration plan will give the group a guideline on timeframes for a staged restoration approach over the next decade and how the goals can be achieved.”

3 Relative Elevation Model

As in the Waimakariri post, I used the python package RiverREM to build this model. There wasn’t a reliable river centreline available, so I quickly mapped one out in QGIS - my favourite GIS software when I’m not coding! Elevation data came from the Waikato LiDAR 1m DEM.5

The Otama catchment REM reveals features not immediately apparent in aerial photography. For example, the main Otama River channel has been straightened and channelised, leaving the original river meanders cut off and filled with tidal waters. On the east and west of the image, an extensive drainage network is visible, maintaining the farmland free of surface water.6 Using the terrain colour scale, you can easily imagine where the original wetland might have extended by comparing areas of the same colour, which correspond to the same elevation.

Below are four versions of the Otama Catchment REM using different colour scales. These emphasise different parts of the landscape, and I can’t decide which I like best!


4 Interactive Map

Here’s the REM on an interactive map, allowing you to zoom and pan around. This version uses the Mako colour scale and shows the entire catchment. The key advantage of the REM over a DEM in this area is its ability to de-emphasise the relatively large elevation differences of the hills and highlight minute elevation changes within the wetland.

Show the code
# Load the required libraries
library(terra)
library(leaflet)
library(leaflet.extras)
library(leafem)
library(stars)

# Suppress progress bar
terraOptions(progress = 0)

# Load the raster
raster_path <- "/Users/isaacbain/working/isaacbain.github.io/posts/otama-rem/data/clipped_raster_hillshade-color.tif"

r <- raster::brick(raster_path)

r <- subset(r, c(3, 2, 1))

# Create a leaflet map
leaflet() %>% 
  addProviderTiles('CartoDB.Positron', group = "Base Map") |> 
  addRasterRGB(x = r, project = FALSE, opacity = 1, group = "REM", maxBytes = 30 * 1024 * 1024, na.color = "#00000000") |> 
  addFullscreenControl()

5 Conclusion

So there we have it. We’ve explored the use of REMs in a wetland, particularly the beautiful Otama area. It’s clear that REMs really stand out for their ability to visualise minute relative changes in elevation compared to a river or wetland baseline, making them valuable tools for delineating drains and remnant areas.

Footnotes

  1. https://newzealandecology.org/nzje/3444↩︎

  2. https://www.stats.govt.nz/indicators/wetland-area↩︎

  3. https://newzealandecology.org/nzje/3523.pdf↩︎

  4. https://www.otamareservesgroup.co.nz/our-reserves/↩︎

  5. The observant amongst you might notice some vegetation signal left in the DEM and question whether this was really a DSM!↩︎

  6. My desktop assessment, having never visited the catchment, so treat with caution!↩︎